Bush vs. Science
So I've been trying to give the blog a bit of respite from my rantings about US politics, after all it just gets old eventually. But I have to revisit the topic yet again, if for nothing else than the fact that I am seeing a scary trend.
Now the controversy, as Bush sees it, is that scientists want to use embryonic stem cells. The reason for this is because the cells are fresh, in that they haven't undergone years of reproduction and damage, as I understand it. Admittedly these embryonic cells can only be obtained if the embryo is destroyed (i.e. aborted). And this is where the religious fanatics seem to have a problem. I suppose they feel that the scientists will be pressuring people to have abortions just so that they can get more stem cells...or something as stupid as that.
Now as far as Bush is concerned "It crosses a moral boundary that our decent society needs to respect, so I vetoed it,". I wonder how Bush feels about those rich bastards who will try to buy organs from the poor? Isn't that morally wrong as well. Wouldn't it be better for them to just pay to have new ones grown for them in a dish?
On top of all this funding for the National Institute of Health, the body that funds more scientific research than any other, with the goal of improving health (duh!). Now I wonder how much money went into research for new weapons. You know, those things like MOAB which only tend to improve our lives. I wonder how many fetuses have been killed in Iraq due to the war? Then again, do non-Christian fetuses count?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home